Exploring the Relationship Between Critical Access Hospitals and Rural County Health

Kirtan Patel; Amber Maraccini; Timothy Grunert; Wei Yang; Anthony Slonim

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijbse.20210902.13

| Peer-Reviewed

Exploring the Relationship Between Critical Access Hospitals and Rural County Health

Kirtan Patel, Amber Maraccini, Timothy Grunert, Wei Yang, Anthony Slonim

Published in International Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering (Volume 9, Issue 2)

Received: 20 May 2021 Accepted: 8 June 2021 Published: 16 June 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs) were developed as a model to improve the access and availability of hospital services in rural counties. There has been limited research on clinical outcomes to evaluate the impact of CAHs since they were authorized through the Balanced Budget Act. This study evaluates CAH’s performance on clinical outcomes, and compares health outcomes between rural counties with CAHs and rural counties without established federally supported hospitals. The American Hospital Association’s (AHA) Annual Survey Database was used to identify CAHs within rural counties and their characteristics. The County Health Rankings (CHR) data were used to quantify health outcomes by county. US rural counties with CAHs versus remaining US rural counties without CAHs were correlated with measures of Clinical Care (p < 0.001). US rural counties with CAHs presented greater health status with regard to All Health Outcomes, p < 0.0001; Length of Life, p < 0.0001; Quality of Life, p < 0.0001; All Health Factors, p < 0.0001; Health Behaviors, p < 0.0001; Social and Economic Environment, p < 0.0001 and Physical Environment, p < 0.0001, than compared to US rural counties without CAHs. Rural counties serviced by CAHs demonstrate better overall health status scores, on several CHR metrics, as compared to rural counties without CAHs. The only exception to this conclusion being that rural counties without CAHs performed superiorly in the CHR metrics related to primary care and mental health services, demonstrating capacities in which CAHs could improve the impact on health in the counties they serve.

Published in	International Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering (Volume 9, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijbse.20210902.13
Page(s)	27-36
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

US Hospitals, County Health, Social Determinants, Community Benefit, Critical Access Hospitals

References

[1]	Balanced Budget Act of 1997. 105th Congress. August 5, 1997. Retrieved from https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-105hr2015enr/pdf/BILLS-105hr2015enr.pdf. Accessed June 15, 2018.
[2]	County Health Rankings & Roadmaps; A Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Program. (2016). County Health Rankings National Data. Available at: www.countyhealthrankings.org/rankings/data. Accessed June 15, 2018.
[3]	Flex Monitoring Team. AHA Hospital Statistics 2017. University of Minnesota, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and University of Southern Maine. Accessed Jan 10, 2018.
[4]	Maraccini AM et al. “Top Performing US Hospitals and the Health Status of the Counties they Serve.” Journal of Community Health. 2017 Nov 11.
[5]	Hood CM, Gennuso KP, Swain GR, Catlin BB. County Health Rankings: Relationships Between Determinant Factors and Health Outcomes. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2016 Feb; 50 (2): 129-35.
[6]	McCullough JM, Leider JP. “Associations Between County Wealth, Health and Social Services Spending, and Health Outcomes.” American Journal of Preventative Medicine. 2017 Nov; 53 (5): 592-598.
[7]	Wahowiak, L. “Differences in rural, urban health shown in county health rankings.” The Nation’s Health. May/June 2016. 46 (4): 11.
[8]	Joynt KE, et al. “Quality of care and patient outcomes in critical access rural hospitals.” Journal of the American Medical Association. 2011 Jul 6; 306 (1): 45-52.
[9]	Ona L, Dais A. “Economic impact of the critical access hospital program on Kentucky's communities.” Journal of Rural Health. 2011 Winter; 27 (1): 21-8.
[10]	Chan L, Hart LG, Goodman DC. Geographic access to health care for rural Medicare beneficiaries. Journal of Rural Health. 2006 Spring; 22 (2): 140–146.
[11]	Peppard, PE, Kindig, DA, Dranger, E, et al. Ranking community health status to stimulate discussion of local public health issues: The Wisconsin County Health Rankings. American Journal of Public Health. 2008; 98 (2), 209–212.
[12]	American Hospital Association. AHA Annual Survey Database for Fiscal Year 2016. Health Forum LLC. Accessed July 1, 2018.
[13]	Remington, PL, Catlin, BB, & Gennuso, K. The County Health Rankings: Rationale and methods. Population Health Metrics. 2015; 13 (1), 11.
[14]	Warren JC, Smalley KB, Barefoot KN. Perceived ease of access to alcohol, tobacco and other substances in rural and urban US students. Rural Remote Health. 2015 Oct-Dec; 15 (4): 3397. Epub 2015 Oct 31. PubMed PMID: 26518286; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4727394.
[15]	Tzilos GK, Hade EM, Ruffin MT, Paskett ED. Correlates of Risky Alcohol Use Among Women from Appalachian Ohio. Rural Ment Health. 2017; 41 (2): 152-161. doi: 10.1037/rmh0000067. Epub 2017 Jun 8. PubMed PMID: 29085525; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5659387.
[16]	Lambert D1, Gale JA, Hartley D. Substance abuse by youth and young adults in rural America. J Rural Health. 2008 Summer; 24 (3): 221-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2008.00162.x.
[17]	Monroe K, Hardwick W, Lawson V, Nichols E, Nichols M, King WD. Risky Teen Driving in a Rural Southern State. South Med J. 2017 May; 110 (5): 343-346. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000648. PubMed PMID: 28464175.
[18]	Lynne-Landsman SD, Kominsky TK, Livingston MD, Wagenaar AC, Komro KA. Alcohol Sales to Youth: Data from Rural Communities Within the Cherokee Nation. Prev Sci. 2016 Jan; 17 (1): 32-9. doi: 10.1007/s11121-015-0579-2. PubMed PMID: 26228479; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4697874.
[19]	Williams EC, McFarland LV, Nelson KM. Alcohol consumption among urban, suburban, and rural Veterans Affairs outpatients. J Rural Health. 2012 Spring; 28 (2): 202-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2011.00389.x. Epub 2011 Aug 24. PubMed PMID: 22458321.
[20]	Davis CN, Natta SS, Slutske WS. Moderation of Genetic Influences on Alcohol Involvement by Rural Residency among Adolescents: Results from the 1962 National Merit Twin Study. Behav Genet. 2017 Nov; 47 (6): 587-595. doi: 10.1007/s10519-017-9867-x. Epub 2017 Sep 18. PubMed PMID: 28921187; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5963528.
[21]	Farley TA. Sexually Transmitted Diseases in the Southeastern United States: Location, Race, and Social Context. Sex Transm Dis. 2006 Jul; 33 (7 Suppl): S58-64. DOI: 10.1097/01.olq.0000175378.20009.5a.
[22]	Chan L, Hart LG, Goodman DC. Geographic access to health care for rural Medicare beneficiaries. J Rural Health. 2006 Spring; 22 (2): 140-6. PMID: 16606425 DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2006.00022.x.
[23]	Casey MM, Moscovice I. Quality improvement strategies and best practices in critical access hospitals. J Rural Health. 2004 Fall; 20 (4): 327-34.
[24]	Nawal Lutfiyya M1, Bhat DK, Gandhi SR, Nguyen C, Weidenbacher-Hoper VL, Lipsky MS. A comparison of quality of care indicators in urban acute care hospitals and rural critical access hospitals in the United States. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Jun; 19 (3): 141-9. Epub 2007 Apr 18.
[25]	Sheikh K1, Bullock C. Urban-rural differences in the quality of care for medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med. 2001 Mar 12; 161 (5): 737-43.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Kirtan Patel, Amber Maraccini, Timothy Grunert, Wei Yang, Anthony Slonim. (2021). Exploring the Relationship Between Critical Access Hospitals and Rural County Health. International Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering, 9(2), 27-36. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbse.20210902.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Kirtan Patel; Amber Maraccini; Timothy Grunert; Wei Yang; Anthony Slonim. Exploring the Relationship Between Critical Access Hospitals and Rural County Health. Int. J. Biomed. Sci. Eng. 2021, 9(2), 27-36. doi: 10.11648/j.ijbse.20210902.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Kirtan Patel, Amber Maraccini, Timothy Grunert, Wei Yang, Anthony Slonim. Exploring the Relationship Between Critical Access Hospitals and Rural County Health. Int J Biomed Sci Eng. 2021;9(2):27-36. doi: 10.11648/j.ijbse.20210902.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijbse.20210902.13,
  author = {Kirtan Patel and Amber Maraccini and Timothy Grunert and Wei Yang and Anthony Slonim},
  title = {Exploring the Relationship Between Critical Access Hospitals and Rural County Health},
  journal = {International Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering},
  volume = {9},
  number = {2},
  pages = {27-36},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijbse.20210902.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbse.20210902.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijbse.20210902.13},
  abstract = {Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs) were developed as a model to improve the access and availability of hospital services in rural counties. There has been limited research on clinical outcomes to evaluate the impact of CAHs since they were authorized through the Balanced Budget Act. This study evaluates CAH’s performance on clinical outcomes, and compares health outcomes between rural counties with CAHs and rural counties without established federally supported hospitals. The American Hospital Association’s (AHA) Annual Survey Database was used to identify CAHs within rural counties and their characteristics. The County Health Rankings (CHR) data were used to quantify health outcomes by county. US rural counties with CAHs versus remaining US rural counties without CAHs were correlated with measures of Clinical Care (p < 0.001). US rural counties with CAHs presented greater health status with regard to All Health Outcomes, p < 0.0001; Length of Life, p < 0.0001; Quality of Life, p < 0.0001; All Health Factors, p < 0.0001; Health Behaviors, p < 0.0001; Social and Economic Environment, p < 0.0001 and Physical Environment, p < 0.0001, than compared to US rural counties without CAHs. Rural counties serviced by CAHs demonstrate better overall health status scores, on several CHR metrics, as compared to rural counties without CAHs. The only exception to this conclusion being that rural counties without CAHs performed superiorly in the CHR metrics related to primary care and mental health services, demonstrating capacities in which CAHs could improve the impact on health in the counties they serve.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Exploring the Relationship Between Critical Access Hospitals and Rural County Health
AU  - Kirtan Patel
AU  - Amber Maraccini
AU  - Timothy Grunert
AU  - Wei Yang
AU  - Anthony Slonim
Y1  - 2021/06/16
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbse.20210902.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijbse.20210902.13
T2  - International Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering
JF  - International Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering
JO  - International Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering
SP  - 27
EP  - 36
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2376-7235
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbse.20210902.13
AB  - Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs) were developed as a model to improve the access and availability of hospital services in rural counties. There has been limited research on clinical outcomes to evaluate the impact of CAHs since they were authorized through the Balanced Budget Act. This study evaluates CAH’s performance on clinical outcomes, and compares health outcomes between rural counties with CAHs and rural counties without established federally supported hospitals. The American Hospital Association’s (AHA) Annual Survey Database was used to identify CAHs within rural counties and their characteristics. The County Health Rankings (CHR) data were used to quantify health outcomes by county. US rural counties with CAHs versus remaining US rural counties without CAHs were correlated with measures of Clinical Care (p < 0.001). US rural counties with CAHs presented greater health status with regard to All Health Outcomes, p < 0.0001; Length of Life, p < 0.0001; Quality of Life, p < 0.0001; All Health Factors, p < 0.0001; Health Behaviors, p < 0.0001; Social and Economic Environment, p < 0.0001 and Physical Environment, p < 0.0001, than compared to US rural counties without CAHs. Rural counties serviced by CAHs demonstrate better overall health status scores, on several CHR metrics, as compared to rural counties without CAHs. The only exception to this conclusion being that rural counties without CAHs performed superiorly in the CHR metrics related to primary care and mental health services, demonstrating capacities in which CAHs could improve the impact on health in the counties they serve.
VL  - 9
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Kirtan Patel

Renown Health, Reno, USA
Amber Maraccini

Renown Health, Reno, USA
Timothy Grunert

Renown Health, Reno, USA
Wei Yang

School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, USA
Anthony Slonim

Renown Health, Reno, USA

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Kirtan Patel, Amber Maraccini, Timothy Grunert, Wei Yang, Anthony Slonim. (2021). Exploring the Relationship Between Critical Access Hospitals and Rural County Health. International Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering, 9(2), 27-36. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbse.20210902.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Kirtan Patel; Amber Maraccini; Timothy Grunert; Wei Yang; Anthony Slonim. Exploring the Relationship Between Critical Access Hospitals and Rural County Health. Int. J. Biomed. Sci. Eng. 2021, 9(2), 27-36. doi: 10.11648/j.ijbse.20210902.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Kirtan Patel, Amber Maraccini, Timothy Grunert, Wei Yang, Anthony Slonim. Exploring the Relationship Between Critical Access Hospitals and Rural County Health. Int J Biomed Sci Eng. 2021;9(2):27-36. doi: 10.11648/j.ijbse.20210902.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijbse.20210902.13,
  author = {Kirtan Patel and Amber Maraccini and Timothy Grunert and Wei Yang and Anthony Slonim},
  title = {Exploring the Relationship Between Critical Access Hospitals and Rural County Health},
  journal = {International Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering},
  volume = {9},
  number = {2},
  pages = {27-36},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijbse.20210902.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbse.20210902.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijbse.20210902.13},
  abstract = {Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs) were developed as a model to improve the access and availability of hospital services in rural counties. There has been limited research on clinical outcomes to evaluate the impact of CAHs since they were authorized through the Balanced Budget Act. This study evaluates CAH’s performance on clinical outcomes, and compares health outcomes between rural counties with CAHs and rural counties without established federally supported hospitals. The American Hospital Association’s (AHA) Annual Survey Database was used to identify CAHs within rural counties and their characteristics. The County Health Rankings (CHR) data were used to quantify health outcomes by county. US rural counties with CAHs versus remaining US rural counties without CAHs were correlated with measures of Clinical Care (p < 0.001). US rural counties with CAHs presented greater health status with regard to All Health Outcomes, p < 0.0001; Length of Life, p < 0.0001; Quality of Life, p < 0.0001; All Health Factors, p < 0.0001; Health Behaviors, p < 0.0001; Social and Economic Environment, p < 0.0001 and Physical Environment, p < 0.0001, than compared to US rural counties without CAHs. Rural counties serviced by CAHs demonstrate better overall health status scores, on several CHR metrics, as compared to rural counties without CAHs. The only exception to this conclusion being that rural counties without CAHs performed superiorly in the CHR metrics related to primary care and mental health services, demonstrating capacities in which CAHs could improve the impact on health in the counties they serve.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Exploring the Relationship Between Critical Access Hospitals and Rural County Health
AU  - Kirtan Patel
AU  - Amber Maraccini
AU  - Timothy Grunert
AU  - Wei Yang
AU  - Anthony Slonim
Y1  - 2021/06/16
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbse.20210902.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijbse.20210902.13
T2  - International Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering
JF  - International Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering
JO  - International Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering
SP  - 27
EP  - 36
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2376-7235
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbse.20210902.13
AB  - Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs) were developed as a model to improve the access and availability of hospital services in rural counties. There has been limited research on clinical outcomes to evaluate the impact of CAHs since they were authorized through the Balanced Budget Act. This study evaluates CAH’s performance on clinical outcomes, and compares health outcomes between rural counties with CAHs and rural counties without established federally supported hospitals. The American Hospital Association’s (AHA) Annual Survey Database was used to identify CAHs within rural counties and their characteristics. The County Health Rankings (CHR) data were used to quantify health outcomes by county. US rural counties with CAHs versus remaining US rural counties without CAHs were correlated with measures of Clinical Care (p < 0.001). US rural counties with CAHs presented greater health status with regard to All Health Outcomes, p < 0.0001; Length of Life, p < 0.0001; Quality of Life, p < 0.0001; All Health Factors, p < 0.0001; Health Behaviors, p < 0.0001; Social and Economic Environment, p < 0.0001 and Physical Environment, p < 0.0001, than compared to US rural counties without CAHs. Rural counties serviced by CAHs demonstrate better overall health status scores, on several CHR metrics, as compared to rural counties without CAHs. The only exception to this conclusion being that rural counties without CAHs performed superiorly in the CHR metrics related to primary care and mental health services, demonstrating capacities in which CAHs could improve the impact on health in the counties they serve.
VL  - 9
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download